Sweet v. McMahon

Learn if you are a member of the Sweet v. McMahon (formerly Sweet v. Cardona and Sweet v. DeVos) class, and find out more information for class members below:

Frequently Asked Questions About the Sweet v. McMahon Class Action Settlement

The Latest

On January 28, 2026, the court-ordered deadline passed for the Department of Education to issue borrower defense decisions for Post-Class Applicants from Exhibit C schools. Leading up to this deadline, the Department of Education has asked the court for more time to issue decisions, in requests directly contrary to the language of the Settlement Agreement and the binding court order approving the Settlement. 

  • If your application was approved, congratulations! There is nothing else you need to do. You will receive your settlement relief within one year of the date you received your approval notice. 

  • If your application was denied, there are steps you can take. Read PPSL’s recent blog post to learn how to submit for reconsideration. There is no formal deadline for borrowers to submit reconsideration requests, but we encourage you to act quickly. 

  • If you attended an Exhibit C school and did NOT receive a decision on or before January 28, 2026, then you are entitled to Full Settlement Relief. Find the full list of Exhibit C schools here.  

  • The deadline for all other Post-Class Applicant decisions is April 15, 2026. 

We are fighting in court to make sure Post-Class Applicants receive the Full Settlement Relief they are entitled to. Fill out our survey to help PPSL fight for borrowers by understanding how the Department is handling applications.

Key Upcoming Dates:

PPSL will be holding a webinar on Thursday, February 26, at 7 p.m. ET / 4 p.m. PT, where PPSL attorneys will give an update on any litigation developments and provide information about how to apply for reconsideration if you are a post-class applicant who received a denial notice. Register for the webinar here

Background: 

On November 20, 2025, PPSL and student borrowers filed a response including stories shared from post-class members about how granting the Department of Education's requested delay would cause significant financial harm to borrowers. PPSL filed the following response with exhibited evidence: Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Motion To Strike Defendants’ Motion For Relief From Judgment (Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3). 

At the hearing on December 11, 2025, Judge Alsup ruled to deny ED’s request to extend relief decisions for post-class applications related to Exhibit C schools by 18 months and affirmed April 15, 2026 as the deadline for all other Post-Class Applicant decisions.  

On January 22, 2026, the Department of Education again asked the court to extend the deadline for deciding post-class applications related to Exhibit C schools. On January 23, 2026, PPSL filed a response, arguing that the Department’s motion is an improper attempt to obtain “administrative” relief and is not permitted by the local rules of the court. 

Students React to Sweet Victory

Students React to Sweet Victory ⏺

About Sweet v. McMahon

"On the day I graduated college, I never imagined that I would find myself locked in a nearly 20 year battle for justice against a for-profit education company that defrauded me, and against the federal government for failing to protect me from this fraud. More than a quarter million defrauded students have been waiting far too long for justice that should have come without delay, but for which we instead had to fight tooth and nail. But we didn’t give up. Defrauded borrowers stepped up to the plate over and over to share their stories, speak to the court, and refuse to take any of this lying down. Now, when I look back at the day I graduated from college, I think of a lesson my school never taught me — know your rights, and never stop fighting for them."

— Theresa Sweet, lead plaintiff in Sweet v. McMahon

News Coverage